“ON THE MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION OF A TOPOLOGICAL MODEL FOR THE STRUCTURE OF ELMENTARY PARTICLES OF PHYSICS ACCORDING TO THE GHASSEMI’S SPACE-TIME-MASS THEORY OF THE UNIVERSE”
ABSTRACT
A topological model for the structure of elementary particles is proposed. Topological particles from which matter is to be created fill the space-time and are to be the building blocks of space-time. This model only focuses on a kinematics viewpoint.
INTRODUCTION
This
paper is an enlargement of the first one
I wrote which had to
see with a topological model for the structure of elementary particles of
physics according to the Ghassemi’s space-time-mass theory of the universe
. From that paper we can establish the following problem:
¿Which ones should be the last and fundamental building blocks from which matter is made taking into account a topological model and according to the Ghassemi’s space-time-mass theory of the universe?
The
answer to this problem was already established in the same one as it follows:
There are only two kinds of elementary particles being the building blocks of space-time: the first one, whose topological structure has positive gaussian curvature and the second one whose topological structure has negative gaussian curvature.
With this hypothesis it was possible to explain matter creation, electrostatic interaction of charged particles, etc.
Topological particles have been called
the particles in the hypothesis above proposed.
1. TOPOLOGICAL CHANGE
Consider the two-dimensional surface of a sphere with radius
whose gaussian
curvature is constant and equal to
(1.1)
( Figure 1.1.a ). Consider also the surface of torus there where its
gaussian curvature is negative, say,
,
(1.2)
( Figure 1.1.b , shaded part ) ( see details of 1.1 and 1.2 in Do Carmo,
1976, chapter 3 ).

(a)
( b )
Figure 1.1
In this sense it is not difficult to realize that topology of figures
1.1.a and 1.1.b ( shaded part ) are different.
Make
and build up the
following figure

Figure
1.2
Say, we have joined the sphere with the shaded part of the surface of
torus.
Now, we are in conditions of formulating the definition of topological change.
DEFINITION 1.1 We say that a topological change between sets
of points belonging to any surfaces has performed, when as a result of the
union of them, results a set of points belonging to a surface whose topology is
well defined.
From the union made in figure 1.2 the immediate and more simple change
of topology that it can be performed is that which gives as a result the
surface of torus ( Figure 1.3 ).

Figure 1.3
2. TRAVELING LIKE WAVES
Let us consider a one-dimensional transverse like wave*) which travel
along the x-axis. Let us suppose the like wave has wavelength
and frequency
.
Suppose at
the shape of the
like wave is given by
(2.1)
as it can be shown by a solid curve in figure 2.1.

Figure
2.1
is the displacement of
the like wave at
and,
the amplitude (
maximal displacement ) of the like wave. This relation gives a shape that it
repeats itself each like wavelength ( what we want ) since the displacement is
the same. For instance at
,
,
and so on ( since
).
Suppose now that the like waves moves to the
right with velocity
. Then, after a time
, each part of the like wave has been displaced to the right
an amount
without deformation
(dashed curve in figure 2.1 ).
Consider any point at
on the like wave ( for
instance a crest in a position
). After a time
, that crest will have displaced a distance
times greater than
its previous position. In order to describe the same point on the like wave,
the argument of the function must be the same in such a way that we can replace
by
in equation 2.1 to
obtain
(2.2)
Taking
into account the following relations
___________________________________________________________________
I have called like waves those ones with period
![]()
![]()
,
,
(2.3)
where
is the period of
oscillation at each point
the angular frequency
and
the like wave number.
Equation 2.2 can also be written in the form
(2.4)
Furthermore

(2.5)
The amount
is called the phase
of the like wave.
The relation 2.4 is solution of the wave
equation
(2.6)
where
is the velocity of
the like wave.
3.DIMENSIONAL
STRUCTURE OF THE TOPOLOGICAL PARTICLES
Let us see the way we can generate the dimensional structure of the topological particles in using a spatial two-dimensional surface and a temporal 1 – dimensional one.
For instance, we can take the surface of the
sphere and make its radius
varying in time in
the interval
. This will cause that the two-dimensional surface generates
a volume, the three dimensional volume that we know. But taking into account
the relation 1.1, it gives the same thing if we make it to vary in time the
gaussian curvature
( Figure 3.1 ).

Figure 3.1
Then we can say that we have generated a
spatial two-dimensional volume and temporal 1-dimensional one.
4.ANNIHILATION AND COMPACTIFICATION BETWEEN TOPOLOGICAL PARTICLES.
Let us suppose that a topological change has performed. Let us further
suppose that the torus ( as a result of
the topological change ) deforms to a sphere continuously while
. In these circumstances we say that an annihilation process
has performed.
DEFINITION 4.1 An annihilation process between topological
particles is that for which
when a topological
change has performed.
DEFINITION 4.2 A compactification process between topological
particles is an annihilation process between them.
DEFINITION 4.3 A compactification is the result of a
compactification process that has performed in such a way one of the gaussian curvatures of the
topological particles taking part in the process has prevailed ( Figure 4.1 ).

Figure 4.1
In technical paper
was obtained a
fundamental relation in the form
(4.1)
With the help of this
mathematical relation was possible to explain the electrostatic interaction but
now it is possible to explain a new fact what is well known. It is the
existence of positron. Following the explanations about electrostatic
interaction given in technical paper, the schema including the existence of
positron is
![]()
![]()
![]()
R : 

![]()
A : 
![]()
Where

The existence of positron has sense due that for each electron of the group of electrons, the pair
must be different in
such a way they can not experiment a compactification process, say, they repel
each other, although, they must have the same number of compactifications in
order they must have the same mass. In this context there is other possibility
for the parameters
, say, there are pairs of topological particles with the same
values
( so they experiment
attraction ), even though the number of compactifications are the same for
those pairs of topological particles as well as for the electrons. This means
that one of them is a positron. Even more, following the same reasoning above,
it is not difficult to show that each particle has its proper antiparticle.
From equation (4.1) and by differentiation we can derive a pair of
partial differential equations in the unknown functions
,
,
y
as follows.
Differentiating with respect to
x we obtain
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
=0
then
(4.2)
Again from (4.1)

Then equation (4.2) splits into two equations as follow
(4.3)
(4.4)
If
and
are sufficient small,
~1 and similarly
~1
So equations (4.3) and (4.4)
become


or
![]()
![]()
In a similar way by differentiating equation (4.1) with respect to t,
we can derive the following pair of
equations
![]()
![]()
Say we have obtained a set of four non - homogeneous linear partial
differential equations in the unknown functions
,
,
and
. However we can only take two of them, for instance
![]()
(4.5)
or
![]()
![]()
and in order to solve any of
these pairs of equations we need
two more. However we can discuss the system (4.5) assuming
, so we have
(4.6)
(4.7)
Integrating ( 4.6)
(4.8)
or
(4.9)
from (4.8) by partial differentiation

then
(4.10)
(4.10) in (4.7) gives
(4.11)
so from (4.9) and (4.11) we get the ordinary differential equation
(4.12)
Solving (4.12) we get
, where
(4.13)
Finally, (4.13) in (4.8) gives
(4.14)
In a similar way we can solve the system (4.5) for the case
and obtain the
solution
(4.15)
where
Since we have assumed
and by replacing (4.14) in (4.1) we have

But